Hi, On Tue, 1 Sept 2026 at 17:04, Sehrope Sarkuni <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's a _lot_ of noise in CI, but I think 1 + 2 is already the bulk of the > gains. > Look like that's a bit further than Nazir's version as it picks a more > specific LSN for the ranges.
I haven't checked the patches yet but for this problem I generally select any other long-running test and try to normalize test timings. What I mean is: With patch: postgresql:pg_waldump/001_basic 200s pg_rewind/002_databases 455s Without the patch: pg_waldump/001_basic 300s pg_rewind/002_databases 315s After normalizing the 'without the patch' timings: pg_waldump/001_basic 430s pg_rewind/002_databases 455s -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
