On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 11:48 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > This is only somewhat less bogus, though: it'd still fail at OID > wraparound. How about sorting by the constraint name?
Good point. I didn't take OID wraparound into consideration. I think sorting by conname works, as the connames are unique within each of these queries. I noticed that several other test files use COLLATE "C" when sorting by names, so that the order is independent of the database's default collation. So I end up using ORDER BY conname COLLATE "C" in v2. - Richard
v2-0001-Fix-OID-counter-sensitive-row-ordering-in-foreign.patch
Description: Binary data
