On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 11:38 PM chris <[email protected]> wrote:
> > A few questions, if anyone can point me in the right direction: > > 1. Is quantified path pattern support intentionally deferred past 19, or is > there a patch/commitfest entry already in flight that I should be watching? It's deferred. There is no concrete proposal (which covers all aspects of quantified path) with patch yet. > 2. If it's deferred, is there a tracking thread or open item I could link to, > so the book can point readers at the right place instead of just saying "not > yet"? none ATM > 3. Is there a recommended workaround inside SQL/PGQ itself for > unbounded-depth traversal, or is a recursive CTE still the correct answer for > that case in 19? > recursive CTE > Thanks for all the work getting SQL/PGQ this far — the fixed-depth pattern > matching and undirected edge support are genuinely nice additions. > Thanks for the compliments. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
