On Thu, Sep 3, 2026 at 10:29 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> writes: > > I'm not sure I have a strong preference, keeping it in sync with > > pg_basebackup > > seems like a pretty good strategy to make it easier for users. > > It looks to me like there was a fair amount of consensus behind > 025584a16, so I think we should conclude that pg_basebackup's new > behavior (ignore stray files) is the right thing and it was an > oversight that pg_checksums wasn't adjusted similarly.
Sounds good, thanks both! Attached is the simplest thing that could fix the reported problem (and nothing else), but I'd rather look into moving parse_filename_for_nontemp_relation() to common/relfile.c so it can be used directly. I probably won't have time for that today. --Jacob
0001-WIP-pg_checksums-Ignore-more-stray-files-in-director.patch
Description: Binary data
