On Thu, Sep 3, 2026 at 4:53 PM Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02.09.26 21:29, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > As such, unless we are misunderstanding something about the > > discussion, we feel it would be better to revert this in 19. That > > would take off the time pressure now and would make it easier to fix > > these things properly in 20 without having to be burdened by backwards > > compatibility and backpatching. > > Ok, let's do it. > > For clarification: Revert from REL_19_STABLE only, or also from master?
IMHO, this needs enough rework that it should come out of both. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
