On Mon, 07 Sep 2026, Dean Rasheed <[email protected]> wrote: > However, that fix seems to have the same kind of layering > violation that Andres complained about for the first version of the > patch on this thread -- predicate locking should be in heapam code, > not in execIndexing.c.
It's not just the layering violation, that solution also has a leftover issue, similarly to my first patch in this thread. When I looked at this my initial conclusion was that we can't fix the two at the same place without layering violations / remaining issues, so my idea was to apply the same fix as I did for SELECT to those paths, but I'll take another look at it.
