> It's a good idea to write something like this to convince yourself
> that the hook is usable for something useful, but that doesn't mean
> we need to carry that proof in-tree forevermore.

You're right.  The test only checks that the hook gets called.  It
doesn't check that anything behaves differently, and that isn't worth
spinning up a session for.  Writing it did convince me the hook is
usable, like you say, but that doesn't mean it has to stay in the tree.
Dropping 0002.

I should also correct what I wrote about it.  That description was from
an different version which added a path and checked that the planner
gathered it and built Finalize Aggregate on top.  Even that is existing
planner behavior, not something 0001 adds.

Review is otherwise unchanged.  I only have the Nit commit message and
comment suggestions from my earlier mail.

Given there is no major feedback open, I change the patch to Ready for
Committer.

Thanks,
Shihao

Reply via email to