On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 9:08 AM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > (This was first suggested by me in thread [1], but it was deemed out > of scope, so I have now separated it here.) > > I was looking at the many messages related to logical replication > conflicts (in conflict.c, function errdetail_apply_conflict). > Currently, the wording for the errmsgdetail seems a bit inconsistent > to me. I felt that because all of these messages are closely related, > they should all resemble each other more than they do now. > > ~~~
Hi Peter, Just want to +1 the general idea here. Consistency across these conflict messages is worth caring about - it helps users pattern-match on wording in logs. It also makes it easier for whoever adds a new conflict type later to slot into an existing style rather than drifting further apart. regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
