Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2026-Sep-05, Osama Abdul Qader wrote:
> 
> > I understand the distinction now. Allowing REPACK (ANALYZE) in a
> > transaction block in the future would not necessarily mean that it is safe
> > to execute it from a function, procedure, or DO block, since ANALYZE may
> > start a new transaction in process_single_relation() while an SPI session
> > is active.
> 
> Well, I think the main point of running REPACK (ANALYZE) inside a
> transaction is to allow it to run in a procedure.  Consider something
> like
> 
> do $$
>         declare r record;
>         begin
>                 for r in
>                 select relname from pg_class where relkind = 'r' and
>                         relnamespace = (select oid from pg_namespace where 
> nspname = 'public')
>                 loop
>                         execute 'repack (verbose) ' || r.relname;
>                         commit;
>                 end loop;
>         end
> $$;
> 
> This works fine today and with the patch, both with REPACK and with
> CLUSTER (good); but not with VACUUM FULL (sad, but we no longer care:
> just use repack.)
> 
> This is useful because it allows server-controlled execution of
> repacking each table in its own transaction.  But as soon as you add the
> ANALYZE option, which would be valuable, this recipe no longer works.
> 
> My point is that just the ability to run REPACK (ANALYZE) in a
> transaction block without allowing it in a function would be, I think,
> rather pointless -- who could possibly be interested in repacking
> multiple tables in the same transaction?  There's just no benefit.
> 
> OTOH I think it may even be useful to implement in-procedure execution
> for CONCURRENTLY, but that's likely a more challenging patch than
> ANALYZE.

An alternative approach: as there are various commands that start their own
transactions, it could help if we taught the EXECUTE command - when executed
from pl/pgsql procedure or anonymous block (DO) - to accept this behavior.

That would probably require a new option for EXECUTE to declare that a new
transaction is either started by the statement, or (if the statement actually
does not do it) by EXECUTE itself.

(Then we might want to enhance the corresponding commands / functions in other
languages, however it seems most useful in pl/pgsql.)

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com


Reply via email to