On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 07:28:51PM +0530, Ayush Tiwari wrote: > On Mon, 7 Sept 2026 at 23:28, Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think this should be applied as a single squashed commit, >> (soon so I can rely on it for the fixes I mentioned).
Yeah, a backpatch seems adapted. That's a nasty problem. It's unlikely going to be hit in practice, but we can say that for a bunch of stuff that gets backpatched. >> I think it should be backpatched - all live branches have the same problem. > > Agreed that this should be backpatched to all live branches. Andrew, are you planning to work on it? I did not spend cycles looking at the details and the command patterns involved, on the premise that you would handle that. Saying that, the premise of the patch feels sound with a few more additional shared locks to prevent the concurrent manipulations. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
