Dear Vignesh,

> Thanks kuroda-san. I have addressed this in the v2 version patch
> attached, however I did not change the lock mode and used the existing
> AccessShareLock mode itself as I felt that should suffice. This
> approach also addresses Chao's comments from [1].

My intention was similar but can we unify codes for re-validation?
My idea attached here could be applied atop v2.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Attachment: v2_kuroda.diffs
Description: v2_kuroda.diffs

Reply via email to