Hi Andrey, Matthias,
> > Matthias, Surya, Ewan, do you think that is a useful and sound scope for > > the patch? It seems very narrow, so we can just rejection the patch. > > I think the scope is very narrow indeed, and I'm not convinced we can > commit to such a patch without losing some consistency/correctness > guarantees that we do get with that specific settings combination. > Yes, I do agree with Matthias that we might lose the correctness guarantees. So I am not very positive in this direction. Regards, Surya Poondla
