On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 9:35 AM Noah Misch <[email protected]> wrote:
> The first discussion linked from the 76e514e commit message, [1], described
> the "main use case" as "dumping role definitions for migration or backup
> purposes without needing pg_dumpall".  My review findings are about failures
> that arise when using the feature as part of a migration.
>
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]

I think you're absolutizing this to a greater degree than seems fair
to me. I agree with you that the justification for not including
passwords in the output doesn't make sense; IMHO, not including them
is just incorrect behavior. The dependency handling thing I do not
find so black-and-white. I think that point merits discussion, rather
than conclusory statements.

-- 
Robert Haas


Reply via email to