On Sep 14, 2026, at 10:50, Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Benchmarked with data sized to fit comfortably under shared_buffers rather > than triggering the seqscan ring-buffer bypass, which otherwise swamps the > comparison at larger table sizes: ~10x on pure ASCII, ~4x on an 85/15 > ASCII/non-ASCII mix, and no measurable regression on non-ASCII input > that still needs the full decode-and-quickcheck path. Well this looks super simple and like a very nice speedup! Thanks for digging into that! D
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
