On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 08:57:51AM +0100, Alexandre Felipe wrote:
> This was motivated by two rebases on the SLOPE patch [1] this week due to
> changes in parallel_schedule. Also I find much easier to parse the list
> using this syntax, if we stick with one test per line we get the benefit of
> counting tests by looking at the line numbers.
> 
> I used a `goto` to keep the number of touched lines small, and facilitate
> your review.

I'd +1 something like that in the schedule files, even if we only
limit the number of tests per line to be up to 20.

+test:
+    boolean
+       char
+       name

At least, let's make the whitespace vs tab policy consistent.  ;)
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to