On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 12:55 AM Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 10:58 AM Richard Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > As for the division-by-zero case, I agree it's user-visible, but I > > think eager aggregation should follow the same rules as our existing > > transformations, which already evaluate expressions on rows that a > > join removes.
> OK, good. So this isn't really doing something that is fundamentally > new, which is what I was fearing. Do you think this section should be > adjusted at all? Yes, I think it's worth saying that an expression can be evaluated on rows that don't appear in the result. - Richard
