Re: Bug in logical decoding with DDL and subtransactions

Thu, 17 Sep 2026 18:40:21 -0700 

Hi Álvaro,

Apologies -- the branch versions did not make it onto that mail.
Here they are.

Thanks,
Bingshuai Li

Attachment: v4-REL_14_STABLE-0001-Fix-stale-tuplecid-records-left-behind-by-aborted.patch
Description: v4-REL_14_STABLE-0001-Fix-stale-tuplecid-records-left-behind-by-aborted.patch

Attachment: v4-REL_15_STABLE-0001-Fix-stale-tuplecid-records-left-behind-by-aborted.patch
Description: v4-REL_15_STABLE-0001-Fix-stale-tuplecid-records-left-behind-by-aborted.patch

Attachment: v4-REL_16_STABLE-0001-Fix-stale-tuplecid-records-left-behind-by-aborted.patch
Description: v4-REL_16_STABLE-0001-Fix-stale-tuplecid-records-left-behind-by-aborted.patch

Attachment: v4-REL_17_STABLE-0001-Fix-stale-tuplecid-records-left-behind-by-aborted.patch
Description: v4-REL_17_STABLE-0001-Fix-stale-tuplecid-records-left-behind-by-aborted.patch

Reply via email to