On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 4:01 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 06:22:35PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: > > I guess pg_get_multixact_usage() sounds better to me and it matches the > > code comment: > > That would be OK here. CC-ing Nathan for RMT input, as this would > require a catversion bump.
I don't have an issue with a catversion bump as long as it's before GA and it doesn't make it more likely we'll have to change it again after GA. - Melanie
