> The issue that the 0001 patch you shared is trying to fix is the same > one reported upthread
Ops, sorry for missing that, I only read the last few messages in the thread properly and I didn't realize that it was a known issue. I'll look into that discussion more. > 2b) For Non-ALL-TABLES publications, the behavior was already correct; > the change below is a no-op: Yes, that part was a cosmetic change to make everything follow the same approach, I don't think it causes any actual issues.
