On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 10:37:12AM +0800, Chao Li wrote: > On Sep 24, 2026, at 09:30, shihao zhong <[email protected]> wrote: >> With the patch it reads NULL. The patch clears it the same way >> ProcWakeup() does, like 70f470314cb did for the grant path. It applies >> to 14 and up. > > Looks good to me. Once proc->waitLock is cleared, proc->waitStart no > longer describes an active wait, so clearing it at the same time > seems right.
Yep, it looks weird to not clean up the field in this code path. @Fujii-san, what do you think? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
