On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 9:58 AM Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 5:06 PM Bharath Rupireddy > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > AI review found a bug in parallel autovacuum (1ff3180ca01). I checked > > it myself and it reproduces on HEAD and PG19. Patch and reproducer > > attached. > > > > When no DSM segment can be created, InitializeParallelDSM() does not > > fail. It sets up the parallel context in the leader's own memory with > > zero workers and leaves pcxt->seg NULL. Parallel query checks that > > pointer before using it, see ExecInitParallelPlan(), and VACUUM > > (PARALLEL) never looks at it and vacuums all the indexes in the > > leader. Parallel autovacuum registers a DSM detach callback on it, so > > the autovacuum worker segfaults and the database goes through crash > > recovery. It also leaves pv_shared_cost_params pointing into the > > leader's private memory with nothing left to reset it. > > Thank you for the report and the patch! > > I agree with your analysis and it should be fixed. The proposed patch > is simple and looks good to me, so I'm going to push it barring any > objections.
Pushed. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
