Hi, In the partition_aggregate tests, there's a case where the explained query doesn't match the query that's executed just below. This has existed since the file was first committed (e2f1eb0ee3), and doesn't materially affect the plan, but if any issues were introduced it might not show up in this part of the test, so we should probably fix it.
Attached is a simple fix. I noticed the issue whilst debugging my low-rowcount parallel scan costing efforts [0]. Kind regards, Matthias van de Meent Databricks (https://www.databricks.com) [0] https://postgr.es/m/caeze2wi+jp26mhbjvrmshkgynttpcxzd1bwoew_7+eh6saj...@mail.gmail.com
v1-0001-regress-query-discrepancy-between-explain-vs-exec.patch
Description: Binary data
