On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 8:43 PM Tatsuya Kawata <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the confusion. Yes, it's the same query as yours. I just > wanted to note that without asserts it silently returns wrong results > (1 row instead of 4) rather than raising an error, in case that's > useful for the back-patch decision.
Thanks! Yeah, this warrants a back-patch. I've pushed the fix and back-patched it to all supported branches. - Richard
