Hi Robert,                                                                      
                   
                                                                                
                      
Thanks for the rewrite. The v2 wording is clearer, and the patch looks good to 
me.                                                           
                                                                                
                      
Best regards,                                                                   
                   
Dongpo Liu


On Friday, October 9th, 2026 at 9:15 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 4, 2026 at 8:38 AM Dongpo Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The patch adds a paragraph to the Limitations section of pg_plan_advice
> > and a short pointer in pg_stash_advice.  It says that advice is consulted
> > only at plan time, mentions DISCARD PLANS for the current session, and
> > refers to PREPARE for when other sessions re-plan.
> 
> I think it's a good idea to add something to the documentation about
> this issue, but I'm not entirely convinced by this wording. In
> particular:
> 
> "The new advice is used the next time the statement is planned" => To
> me, this sort of makes it seem like you could just leave
> pg_plan_advice.advice set the whole time, which is not a realistic
> approach. Or else as though it will remember the advice that it didn't
> use this time and use it next time re-planning actually happens, which
> it won't.
> 
> "Plans cached by other sessions are re-planned only when something
> else invalidates them; see <xref linkend="sql-prepare"/>." => I feel
> like there are two ways to read this. One possible reading is that
> replanning doesn't happen on every use of the cache, but only when
> there is a reason to replan. That's just the definition of a cache.
> The other possible reading is that invalidation is the only thing that
> can trigger replanning, which isn't true;
> for example, the other session could have a custom plan, or it could
> execute DISCARD PLANS itself.
> 
> Here's my rewrite. (Also, I committed my latest round of bug-fix patches.)
> 
> --
> Robert Haas
> Databricks
>


Reply via email to