On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 10:49 PM Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > But I'd be inclined to use a conditional rule only if > we can base it on information that we already have cached in some > planner data structure, and not if we'd have to look it up in the > catalog.
We don't have that cached, so I've pushed a fix that just removes the case. It also moves the relkind test ahead of has_subclass(). - Richard
