Hi Shihao, Thanks for checking this manually. That makes sense—the early check and consistency with the postmaster.pid
I have no further comments on this point. Regards, Tinh Vào CN, 11 thg 10, 2026 vào lúc 09:32 shihao zhong <[email protected]> đã viết: > i Tinh, > > Thanks for testing. > > > One possible test enhancement would be to assert that pg_control, > > the WAL files, and backup_label remain unchanged after each refusal. > > I would leave that out. The check runs before pg_resetwal reads > pg_control, right after the postmaster.pid check, so nothing has been > written at that point. The postmaster.pid refusal has no such test > either. I did check by hand, and all three are unchanged after each > refusal. > > Thanks, > Shihao >
