On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 08:31:19AM +0800, Chao Li wrote: > pg_indexam_progress_phasename(), which sits between these two > layers, should also use int64. So the patch looks correct to me.
Yep, nice catch. This warrants a backpatch. Will fix, thanks for the report. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
