Hi Prashant, Thank you for the review and the testing.
> One small coverage note: the new test covers the pretty, named-AS > form. The DEFAULT form and the non-pretty output are exercised by my > testing above but are not in the patch's tests; a DEFAULT line in the > new test would be a nice addition, but I do not consider it a blocker. Good point. I will extend the test and post a v2. Best regards, Henson
