On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 5:34 PM Greg Burd <[email protected]> wrote: ... > The auto-training/retraining aspect is likely going to elicit a lot of good > design feedback and differing opinions, but I'd like those who participate in > the discussion about that to first acknowledge that the fundamental idea of > auto-retraining/evolution of dictionaries is an idea that they feel should be > in or out of this kind of solution explicitly and up front if possible.
At least the underlying storage should allow multiple dictionalries for the same relation and moving to newer dictionaries or some heuristic for dictionary selection. It also would be nice to have an option for "retiring" a dictionary by - setting it read-only, so no new rows can use it - having some process re-encode old values (or maybe in some cases just wait until partitions with such values are dropped) - then have a verify and drop function > I do think it is a good idea and should be in, but there should be functions > to > manage dictionaries manually and a way to enable/disable the automatic piece. +1
