> On 26 Oct 2026, at 20:45, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Given the lack of field complaints, I'm inclined to leave it as-is > in released branches (maybe it's not too late for v19, though).
If we're leaving it as-is in backbranches, wouldn't it be better to opt for consistency and leave it in 19 as well and only adjust the documentation? -- Daniel Gustafsson
