On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 03:32:44PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Uggh. I think that this is the right fix given that > rewrite_heap_tuple() is documented to rely on hint bits being set for > correctness, but it seems to me to be pretty questionable that we rely > on hint bits being set for correctness. It's not going to be obvious > to someone modifying HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() or > HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuumHorizon() that rewrite_heap_tuple() critically > depends on that, and even if we added a comment about that, somebody > reading that comment might justifiably complain about our decision to > create such a dependency.
As far as I know this is implied since 7b78474da356. So it's been around for some time... It's really hard to miss, as the other thread has proved. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
