Andres Freund <[email protected]> writes:
> On 2026-11-01 17:13:26 +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote:
>> Filtering my report with this rule, I think we need to take care of 4-7, 11,
>> 13
> We're quite busy, being flooded with bug reports and ginormous patches. Why
> are we trying to find even more work by searching for inconsequential stuff
> like this? I really don't get it. Like, you wrote a fuzzer to search for
> these. WHY?
The reason was mentioned at the top of the thread: some people monitor
their logs for XX000 errors. I agree that we can't afford to spend
a lot of effort on this, but fixing easily-reached cases seems like a
reasonable thing to do, IMO.
regards, tom lane
