> > Anyway, what do you think about the attached to address this hole in > > the tests? > > LGTM and I don't see a strong case for backpatching.
The test looks good to me as well. I don't think it should be backpatched. v5-0001 now includes the previously lost test. v5-0002 is the same as v4, but without including the v5-0001 test and using PGSTAT_KIND_INVALID instead of a new PGSTAT_KIND_ALL. -- Sami
v5-0001-test_custom_stats-Add-test-for-dropped-stats.patch
Description: Binary data
v5-0002-pgstat-Add-kind-filter-to-pgstat_drop_matching_en.patch
Description: Binary data
