On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 5:39 AM Raja Sai pranav <[email protected]> wrote: > The attached patch adds the missing check: if the prior backup's final > timeline has an end in this server's history, the prior backup's WAL range > must not end after it.
Thanks for the report and patch! Attached is a revised version with these changes: - Check the timeline switch point before the new backup's start LSN, so the error directly reports the history mismatch. - Extend 008_promote.pl rather than adding a separate test. - Document the timeline requirement for incremental backup. Thought? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
v2-0001-Reject-incremental-backups-based-on-a-backup-from.patch
Description: Binary data
