On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 05:51:08PM -0800, Lukas Fittl wrote: > Is there a reason we feel that "strategy ring" is the better choice? > If we wanted to make it more clear that its a ring buffer used as part > of a buffer access strategy maybe we can do "strategy ring buffer"? > (or "strategic ring buffer"?)
It's used in the glossary of the documentation on HEAD, at least. I'd tend to agree that "Buffer Access Strategy ring" would be a more complete term when not in the context of the glossary page. If the BAS are explicitely described, like in the glossary, "strategy ring" reads fine. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
