> On 6 Nov 2026, at 18:44, Zsolt Parragi <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 06 Nov 2026, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: >> The attached .txt >> (intentionally not a .diff or .patch since I didn't re-send your full >> patchset) >> massages your 0001 to make it more consistent with the rest of the >> documentation. > > Thanks, it looks good to me.
Thanks for looking, I'll apply it later tonight when back at the laptop. >> For v19 I don't see it as >> a realistic change (and I think it was too late even when initially raised, >> even though it was a lot earlier in the cycle than now), but hopefully we can >> raise the bar in v20. > > Yes, when I originally submitted the thread I thought this was a > bug/oversight as I didn't find any mention of it being intentional. > Since it was intentional, it was definitely too late in June. I simply > kept all 3 parts there so that they don't get forgotten, as I think > 0003 should be a good improvement without breaking any use cases. +1. -- Daniel Gustafsson
