Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2026 at 02:47:52PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> + Avoid resetting a replication
> + subscription's <literal>two_phase</literal> state to pending if it
> + is already enabled (Zhijie Hou)
> We should also mention that:
> This changes behavior when slot_name is altered together with SET
> (two_phase = true) on an ENABLED subscription. Previously the state was
> reset to PENDING and the apply worker enabled two_phase on the replacement
> slot. Now the state stays ENABLED and the apply worker does not touch the
> replacement slot's two_phase property.
> It's in the commit message and was added to ensure it's in the release note,
> see [1].
Hmph. I read that and I was like "so what?". Why would users need
to know that? How likely is it that anyone would issue such a
combined command in the first place?
regards, tom lane
