On Sun, 25 Oct 2026 at 03:44, Tatsuya Kawata <[email protected]> wrote: > Attached is v6, based on your patch, which leaves FunctionNext() as is. > 0001 is v5 as is, and 0002 is your patch with my changes on top. I kept > them separate so that the changes from your patch are easy to see, but > 0002 should be squashed into 0001.
Thanks. Looks good now. I made a few small adjustments and pushed. David
