Hi João, On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 11:03 AM João Rito <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 3. On the test, Srinath suggested truncating the standby's copy of the last > segment by 8 bytes instead of padding with a retry loop. I like the idea of > a deterministic setup, but I am not sure it works as described. WAL segment > files are always full size, and I think a short segment file makes the > standby fail with an error when it reads it, instead of showing the > boundary > case. Zeroing the last 8 bytes instead of truncating might work better. Thanks, this is what I also intended to say but somehow missed about 0ing. -- Thanks :) Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
