On Wed, Nov 11, 2026 at 9:13 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2026 at 10:03 PM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The patch also looks good to me.
>
> Yes, it LGTM too.
>
> "long" is a signed 8 bytes everywhere except on Windows, where it is 4
> bytes, and passing a number of tuples more than the 4-byte limit could
> potentially expose it to overflows.
>
> -Wfloat-conversion tells me there are other such uses [1] (haven't
> checked in depth whether these are worth fixing, and even if they need
> to be, in a separate thread of course).
>
> > I wonder if we can still get this into 19, as it hasn’t been released yet. 
> > This may be our last chance to change these function signatures for 19.
>
> +1 to back-patch to PG19 (assuming we have another release after RC2
> before the planned GA on Nov 19th) to avoid the overflow issues and
> keep the version diff small.

Agreed to backpatch to v19.

I've just pushed the fix. Thank you!

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com


Reply via email to