On 2026-Nov-12, Zhijie Hou wrote: > Since there's only one publication in this file, I think the current name is > fine as we don't need to distinguish it from any other publication. Similar > names are also used in other tests.
Right now, isolation tests run one after the other, so you're right that this name doesn't really matter much. However, someday it might be nice if we can make (some of) them run in parallel. We tried to do that eons ago, couldn't find the time to implement it, idea was forgotten. If that effort ever takes off again it would be nice if we don't have to fix a thousand pointless name conflicts of this kind. (We already have enough of those that we'll have to fix.) So I think Shveta had the right idea here. Anyway, thanks everybody for getting this fixed. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "The problem with the future is that it keeps turning into the present" (Hobbes)
