Greetings, * Evgeniy Efimkin (efim...@yandex-team.ru) wrote: > In postgresql 10 and 11 only superuser can create/alter subscriptions. > If there was a special role (like pg_monitor), it would be more easy to grant > control on subscriptions. > I can make a patch if there are no objections against it.
I think the short answer is 'yes, we should let non-superusers do that', but the longer answer is: What level of access makes sense for managing subscriptions? Should there be a way to say "user X is allowed to create a subscription for remote system Y, but only for tables that exist in schema Q"? My general feeling is 'yes', though, of course, I don't want to say that we have to have all of that before we move forward with allowing non-superusers to create subscriptions, but I do think we want to make sure that we have a well thought-out path for how to get from where we are now to a system which has a lot more granularity, and to do our best to try avoiding any paths that might paint us into a corner. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
