Alexander Kuzmenkov <[email protected]> writes: > El 11/11/18 a las 07:38, Tom Lane escribió: >> I think you have the right basic idea, but we don't have to completely >> lobotomize the bitmap-and search logic in order to cope with this. >> This code is only trying to figure out which paths are potentially >> redundant, so for a path with too many quals, we can just deem it >> not-redundant, as attached.
> Thanks for the patch, looks good to me.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing.
regards, tom lane
