On 9 November 2018 at 19:18, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> I have a comment regarding how you chose to make
> PartitionTupleRouting private.
>
> Using the v14_to_v15 diff, I could quickly see that there are many diffs
> changing PartitionTupleRouting to struct PartitionTupleRouting, but they
> would be unnecessary if you had added the following in execPartition.h, as
> my upthread had done.
>
> -/* See execPartition.c for the definition. */
> +/* See execPartition.c for the definitions. */
>  typedef struct PartitionDispatchData *PartitionDispatch;
> +typedef struct PartitionTupleRouting PartitionTupleRouting;

Okay, done that way. v16 attached.

The 0002 patch is included again, this time with a new proposed commit
message.  There was some discussion over on [1] where nobody seemed to
have any concerns about delaying the locking until we route the first
tuple to the partition.

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25C1C6B2E7BE044889E4FE8643A58BA963B5796B@G01JPEXMBKW03

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment: v16-0001-Speed-up-INSERT-and-UPDATE-on-partitioned-tables.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: v16-0002-Delay-locking-of-partitions-during-INSERT-and-UP.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to