On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:08:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, if it is an issue then it's an issue for back branches too. > It's fine, I think, as long as the warning stays a warning ... > but there are lots of ways in which trying to print a warning > might turn into an error.
At the end I have agreed with this position, and patched back-branches so as they use an assertion instead of the elog(). So committed. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
