On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 01:38:55PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > I've fixed 0001 again to re-order the code so that allocations happen the > correct context and now tests pass with the rebased patches.
I have been looking at 0001, and it seems to me that you make even more messy the current situation. Coming to my point: do we have actually any need to set rel->rd_pdcxt and rel->rd_partdesc at all if a relation has no partitions? It seems to me that we had better set rd_pdcxt and rd_partdesc to NULL in this case. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature