Greetings, * Magnus Hagander (mag...@hagander.net) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:02 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On the other hand, If we always reserve max_wal_senders slots > > available slots for normal backend will get decreased in the next > > release, which require for users to re-confiugre the max_connection. > > But I felt this behavior seems more natural than the current one, so I > > think the re-configuration can be acceptable for users. > > Maybe what we should do instead is not consider max_wal_senders a part of > the total number of connections, and instead size the things that needs to > be sized by them by max_connections + max_wal_senders. That seems more > logical given how the parameters are named as well.
I tend to agree with having max_connections + max_wal_senders. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
