On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 05:33:26PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > Yeah, I also agree with 'reply_time'. But please also note that we had > the discussion when there is not the similar system catalogs and > fields. Now that we have them it might be worth to consider to follow > the existing name for consistency.
The fields in pg_stat_wal_receiver are named after their respective fields. Now if you look at the fields from pg_stat_replication, you have those from the standby: sent_lsn => Last write-ahead log location sent on this connection write_lsn => Last write-ahead log location written to disk by this standby server flush_lsn => Last write-ahead log location flushed to disk by this standby server replay_lsn => Last write-ahead log location replayed into the database on this standby server So to keep the brand consistent, reply_time looks like the best choice as Sawada-san suggests? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
