On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:28 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 29/11/2018 13:28, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > > Unfortunately it needs to be rebased one more time, could you do this? Also > > I'm > > wondering about this: > > > >> I'm moving this patch forward to CF 2018-09, since it's not going to be > >> ready for -07, and we're still whacking around some channel binding > >> details, which would potentially interfere with this patch. > > > > Were you talking about this one [1]? As far as I see it's not a concern > > anymore? I'll move it to the next CF. > > I have decided that I don't want to pursue this patch anymore. It has > served its purpose having allowed us to refine the SSL library > abstractions so that alternative implementations such as macOS Secure > Transport can go ahead. But officially supporting GnuTLS as an > alternative to OpenSSL doesn't seem to have any practical advantages, so > I don't foresee this getting committed into PostgreSQL core.
Hmm, I find that a bit disappointing. I'm not in a position to take up the patch right now, unfortunately. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
