Meskes-san Sorry to bother you, but I hope any comment of yours.
Regards Ryo Matsumura > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG > > > From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki [mailto:tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com] > > > > I think the host variable data type that corresponds to the server-side > > bytea > > should be bytea. As the following pages state or imply, it would be better > > to create standard-compliant LOB types someday, and use the keyword BLOB > in > > ECPG for that type. The server-side data types should have the names BLOB, > > CLOB and NCLOB. Those types should handle data larget than 1 GB and have > the > > locator feature defined in the SQL standard. Maybe we should also advanced > > LOB features like Oracle's SecureFiles LOB and SQL Server's FileTables. > > Tsunakawa-san, thanks for your advice. > I understand that C type definition of client-side bytea is not constrained > by the standard BLOB. > > What should I do next? > For now, I attach a patch that is removed noise(pgindent/typedef.list). > > P.S. > The patch does not support ECPG.bytea in sqltype of "struct sqlvar_struct" > because of compatibility. > > Regards > Ryo Matsumura
